Downtown searching for 'er, looking all around
Saw her getting in
a yellow cab heading up town
I caught a loaded
taxi, paid up everybody's tab
Flipped a twenty
dollar bill, told him 'catch that yellow cab.
Nadine, honey is
that you?
Oh, Nadine
Honey, is that you?
Seems like every
time I catch up with you
You are up to
something new/
- Chuck Berry, Nadine
Among my many stubborn sisters is
one who not only refuses to embrace social media, she is such a Luddite she
sees absolutely no socially redeeming value in the magic of the internets. I
tried to get her to join Pinterest and you’d have thought I was trying to get
her to a Scientology audit.
She contends – can this possibly
be right? - that real life differs in some important way from virtual life. I
know, right? She’s even worse than another stubborn sister who thinks I should
get out more. Like she is trying to
get me to drink and drive, right?
Then, there’s my sister who I
dreamed called to ask me to remind her what was the name of the playing card
between six and eight. You have to think about that for a minute: it was very
vivid. But was it Go Fish? When I told her, she said it was a portent of how we
are losing our minds. Such a worrier. She thinks a zombie looking for brains
would pass right by us. For somebody like me lately so preoccupied with the
coming zombie apocalypse this is such glass half empty thinking of her.
I could go on. But I was on a
mission.
I had determined I’d spend my
afternoon at the keyboard, drinking nothing but water and mediating on a topic
that I can sink my mental teeth into. I mean metaphorical teeth. The idea is to
tackle something, anything, existentially important as an example of how
consulting the internets is better than consulting a Tibetan monk in Lhasa
while suffering the effects of hypoxia. Better wisdom-O2 ratio at my keyboard. It’s not a
complete waste of time and I wanted to prove that the internets can often be used to enrich one’s life when its
power is used for good.
So, I was listening to Chuck
Berry while thinking of a suitable topic, and obviously realized Nadine
would be a perfect subject. I’m trying to show my sister how wise and
all-knowing the internets can be, and plus entertaining.
If you google image Nadine, you
get pictures of dark long brunettes looking over their shoulders in
chiropractically questionable positions and equally uncomfortable/minimal
clothing. And all young and thin and come-hithering and shit. Probably the kind
of woman Chuck was trying to catch up with.
This afternoon I have been
meditating/internetting whether Nadine is a high class whore name. Or whether
it’s just me and google image that thinks that. Maybe some of the women
pictured are famous. They have this Eastwick blank sameness (the equivalent of
the Victorian Interchangeable Emma). A sort of 21st century Raquel
Welch wannabe but less edgy than Raquel. Less authentic than even Madonna who tried too hard to make it look
easy. Then again, the Nadine images could be of the same two or three women.
To be sure, some of the edginess to Nadine is that there’s something more sexy about brunettes. It could
be they’re just malnourished Russians or broke Eurotrash, but I think it may be
that hint of brains. Not enough to be scary for sure, but maybe would get your
jokes, you know?
But not the one about how Paul McCartney was in a band before Wings. They don’t know shit about Wings, and that too may be a good thing. Because sadly blonds too often still do. The blonds, for consideration on some future day, will be mono-named but with invented sharp sounding names. Kyriaka, Zulynn, Mijanou. And Bunny.
But not the one about how Paul McCartney was in a band before Wings. They don’t know shit about Wings, and that too may be a good thing. Because sadly blonds too often still do. The blonds, for consideration on some future day, will be mono-named but with invented sharp sounding names. Kyriaka, Zulynn, Mijanou. And Bunny.
Yahooo Answers wouldn’t even
entertain the question about whether Nadine is a slut name. Using a different
browser (Firefox is a fucking prude) I found out why. One word. Porn.
Now, part of spending the
afternoon on the internet is learning how to follow forks in the information superhighway. Since
Yahoo crashed Messenger rather than address the issue of Nadine’s sluttishness,
I wondered if it was Yahoo in general, or just Nadine. A scientific test was in order.
Turns out, Yahoo is more
responsive when you ask: Why did the monkey fall out of the tree? Oddly, many
replies include white refrigerators. This will remain a mystery meme. Wait, let
me ask google for images of this. Technical difficulties and distractions
ensure.
I began a google
search with “please don’t take…” I think
even my most stubborn sister knows how google loves to play the Let Me Guess What
You’re Asking game. The third suggested answer is “…the baby to the liquor
store”. Drops mike. Walks away.
Then I got more water and came back. Having
come to no conclusion and tabled the Nadine/slut name issue for a future
session, I determined to get me some serious internet wisdom. I read the latest issue of International Socialism
which let’s just say really harshed my Nadine-instigated mellow. So I had to
visit Kate Heidel at Wear Your Cape to cheer the fuck
back up.
So, while it’s
not all fun and games on the internet, there’s some stuff out there that keeps
me interested in life. Too bad when I try to listen to Spotify and practice zen
googling my computer keeps crashing.
Which got me
thinking. Life
is counter intuitive. Glitter has a surprisingly heavy carbon footprint. It
takes more water to make a tiny packet of glitter than it takes to make a
bottle of bottled water.
No comments:
Post a Comment